News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.

Risky exposures

by  /  3 May 2013

A number of studies have suggested that the use of antidepressants or the anti-seizure medication valproate by pregnant women raises the risk of autism in their children. Two new large-scale studies published in April, encompassing 47,700 and 650,000 children respectively, confirm this risk.

Because half of pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned, it’s important for women of childbearing age to have accurate information on the risks associated with these medications.

The valproate study, published 24 April in the Journal of the American Medical Association, is the largest to date to examine the link between autism and prenatal exposure to valproate.

Researchers at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark analyzed data from the more than 655,615 children born in the country from 1996 to 2006. They used national records to determine that 5,437 children were subsequently diagnosed with autism, including 2,067 with the more severe autistic disorder, and that 508 had been exposed to valproate in utero.

Based on these numbers, the overall autism rate is 1.53 percent, and 0.48 percent for autistic disorder. Children who were prenatally exposed to valproate have an absolute risk of 4.42 percent, a threefold increase. For autistic disorder, the absolute risk is 2.5 percent, representing a sixfold increase.

These rates are a bit lower than in a 2008 study, which found a sevenfold increase in risk linked to valproate, likely due to the new study’s much larger size. (The 2008 study analyzed 632 children, about half of them born to women who took the drug during pregnancy.)

The researchers controlled for other factors associated with an increased risk of autism, such as parents’ ages and psychiatric conditions, birth weight, gender and congenital malformations.

Prenatal exposure to valproate is well known to trigger autism-like symptoms in animals. Indeed, valproate treatment is often used to create a rat model of the disorder.

Blues’ clues:

The second study, published 19 April in the British Medical Journal, analyzed data on a subset of young people living in Stockholm County in Sweden between 2001 and 2007. The study included 4,429 children with autism and 43,277 controls, aged 0 to 17 years.

The study found that maternal depression raises autism risk by about 60 percent. One percent of mothers in the autism group had depression when pregnant, compared with about 0.6 percent of mothers in the control group. This increase in risk seems to be limited to autism without intellectual disability. The rate of paternal depression was about 0.4 percent in both groups.

Taking antidepressants during pregnancy also doubles the risk of having a child with autism, again limited to children without intellectual disability. The rates are similar for both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine (Prozac) and the older tricyclic antidepressants, including imipramine (Tofranil).

The researchers say it’s impossible to separate out the risk due to antidepressant use from the risk due to depression itself, which makes it especially difficult for women to decide whether to take the drugs during pregnancy. The results “present a major dilemma in relation to clinical advice to pregnant women with depression,” they write.

If some of the risk is linked to depression itself, it’s possible that antidepressants would actually help. But a smaller study of 300 women who had taken antidepressants during pregnancy, published in 2011, tied increased risk specifically to antidepressant use.

The researchers caution that a diagnosis of depression in their study relied on records from psychiatric specialist care and therefore is likely to represent the most severe cases. (Most people suffering from depression don’t seek help.)

Given the growing use of antidepressants over the past 20 years, some people have suggested that these drugs contribute to the rising prevalence of autism. However, the researchers say antidepressant use would account for less than one percent of autism cases.

  • Jill Escher

    Excellent article on an urgent subject. One correction — antidepressants account for less than 1% of autism cases in *Sweden*, with a low rate of gestational antidepressant use, and not generally. If adjusted for the soaring US rates, it would be much higher.

  • EBell

    Valproate use during pregnancy has AGAIN been shown to be a risk factor for autism. Where is the research then, into the mechanisms? Who is considering the research that taking folate during pregnancy seems to confer protection, and taking Valproate, an anti-folate, increases risk? Or that folate is important in the serotonin pathway–perhaps also linking to a maternal depression connection? We cannot investigate every drug and every exposure one by one, but if we start looking at mechanisms, perhaps we might get somewhere?


Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:



Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.


Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise: