Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.

Late arrival

by  /  2 November 2012

The gender differences in autism are well known, with about four times as many boys as girls diagnosed with the disorder. But the reasons for the discrepancy are unclear. 

Is it because girls are genetically protected from the disorder? Do they learn to cope better with social and other deficits? Or do their symptoms simply look different, so that the diagnostic tools used to screen for the disorder don’t detect them as well? 

All of these factors are likely to contribute to autism’s gender bias. A new study from the Netherlands, published 22 September in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, confirms that diagnosis often comes later for girls and women. 

Studies have shown that the gender bias for Asperger syndrome, a form of autism in which people have normal intelligence and language, is even greater than that for autism overall, with nine times as many boys diagnosed as girls. So the researchers looked at the timing of diagnosis among the subtypes of autism, surveying 2,275 males and females with classic autism, Asperger syndrome or pervasive developmental disorder–not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), a milder form of autism. 

They found that girls with Asperger syndrome are diagnosed an average of 1.8 years later than boys. Neither classic autism nor PDD-NOS showed significant differences in time of diagnosis between boys and girls. 

The results are even worse in adults. Among women older than 18 years, classic autism is diagnosed an average of 4.3 years later than in men, the study found. 

The researchers speculate that the delays either reflect bias on the part of the clinician, or the fact that these girls have different social issues than boys. For example, boys with autism often don’t have best friends, but girls with the disorder may have best friends who are younger. 

Delayed diagnosis of autism in women may be tied to changes in the diagnostic criteria in the 1980s, the researchers say. Many of the adults in the study were diagnosed according to an earlier definition that was based on the disorder’s symptoms in males. 

Some of the delay may also be the result of other differences — such as the age and severity of symptoms — between boys and girls in the study. They also highlight the need to include more females in autism research. 

  • RAJensen

    Kopp and Gillberg have published a revision to ASSQ (autism spectrum screening questionnaire)that may better discriminate the autism phenotype seen in girls (ASSQ-Girls). Kopp and Gillberg found, as did the above article, that girls “interact mostly with younger children”.

    The authors of screening tools such as Baron-Cohen’s ASQ (Autism screening questionnare) might want to consider including symptoms specific to girls in seperate screening tools eg ASQ-Girls and ASQ-Boys that may be able to identify autism in females earlier. Here is the Kopp and Gillberg abstract

    ‘We wanted to develop and validate an extension of the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ)-the ASSQ Revised Extended Version (ASSQ-REV)–for better capturing the female phenotype of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Clinic girls and Clinic boys, most of whom with ASD and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and Community girls without a clinical diagnosis of any kind of neuropsychiatric disorder were compared on the results of the parent-rated ASSQ and on a new set of items (ASSQ-GIRL). The ASSQ-REV discriminated well between cases and non-cases. Certain single ASSQ-GIRL items were much more typical of girls than of boys with ASD. The most striking of these were “avoids demands”, “very determined”, “careless with physical appearance and dress” and “interacts mostly with younger children”. The issue of whether or not there is a gender-specific ASD for phenotype is discussed’.



Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:



Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.


Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise: