News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.

Intense world

by  /  31 January 2011

J. Liba 

I sometimes hear it said that individuals with autism live “in their own world.” They’re often seen as socially withdrawn and unable to communicate with others. Some have repetitive behaviors, obsessing over thoughts and movements that don’t make sense to anyone else. Others have sensory sensitivities — shrinking from bright lights, loud noises and touch. A few are known for exceptional talents — a photographic memory, perfect pitch, lightning fast calculations — that seem beyond the realm of typical human ability.

This wide spectrum of skills and deficits has made it notoriously difficult for scientists to understand what causes autism. One group of researchers has proposed a theory that claims to unify these disparate puzzle pieces. The idea, dubbed the ‘intense world theory,’ says that autism stems from microcircuits in the brain that are hyper-reactive to fragments of the world, allowing the individual to zoom in on tiny details, but ignore the bigger picture that integrates many streams of sensory information.

The idea took root around 2005, when Henry and Kamila Markram presented a paper at the Society for Neuroscience conference on fear in rats. They used an early animal model of autism: rats exposed to valproic acid, an epilepsy drug, during fetal development. Women who take the drug during pregnancy have a higher risk of having a child with autism.

The researchers showed that these animals have overly sensitive fear responses and over-reactive neurons in the amygdala, a region known for processing fear and emotions. In the past few years, they have also found that the rats have super-sensitive neurons in the somatosensory cortex — a brain region that processes touch, temperature and pain — and the prefrontal cortex, which is important for memory, attention and language. The animals also have 50 percent more connections between neurons than do controls. The researchers propose that the diverse characteristics of autism reflect hyperactive circuits cropping up in different regions of the brain.

The valproic acid model of autism has its limits — not least of which is that this environmental exposure accounts for only a fraction of cases of the disorder. In their new review, the Markrams argue that observations from other studies of autism can also be explained by this theory.

For example, brain imaging studies on people with autism have revealed strong short-range and weak long-range brain connections. Mouse models of fragile X syndrome — a genetic disease related to autism — have shown excessive signaling of the chemical messenger glutamate. Abnormal glutamate signaling has also been linked to several candidate genes for autism, including SHANK3, neuroligins and neurexins.

For now, hard evidence of the theory is based on only one environmental model of autism. Still, it’s refreshing to see scientists trying to integrate findings from various labs and methods. Without these attempts at a unified theory, researchers are in danger of getting trapped in their own worlds.

  • Anonymous

    As an autism parent and a scientist, I can say that I think there’s a whole lot to this idea. My autistic son and I were discussing neurons today and why the brain has to filter inputs, and we got onto the subject of autism and how autistic people may not have filters that distinguish signal from noise very well. He relates to that a great deal, I think, and I intuit it in him, in part based on my own experiences. There is no question that the world is intense for autistic people, and I’ve seen in my own children (we have two who are on the spectrum) this homing in on not only the trees, but also specifically the acorns in all their life-harboring potential, in great detail.

    An environmental exposure model is, in some ways, a great place to start because if there are patterns of gene expression change in response to that exposure (e.g., in microarray expression analyses), that can take us straight to the genes. One of those may be SHANK3; I addressed a recent SHANK3 study here:

    It is good to see an effort at integration and one that targets the concept of a spectrum of manifestations, rather than some sort of monolithic mechanism.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Emily,

    Thanks for your comment. I completely agree with you that environmental exposure models can lead to hot genes. I think in the next couple of years we’ll see a swarm of new gene x environment studies, as well as models of complex genetic networks.

    More broadly, I liked the point in your post about the dangers of over-promising autism findings. As science communicators, we need to make it clear in every article that there is almost certainly no magic gene or environmental exposure that will fully explain this extremely heterogeneous disorder.

    Thanks for reading SFARI!


Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:



Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.


Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise: