News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.
News / Spotted

Spotted: Identity crisis; chemical restraint

by  /  17 July 2015

WEEK OF
July 13th

Identity crisis

What term most respectfully describes someone who has autism? Some government agencies, researchers and press outlets (including SFARI.org) promote a person-first approach — that is, the use of ‘person with autism’ instead of ‘autistic person.’ Rather than define a person by his or her condition, the person-first approach is intended to emphasize his or her value as an individual, one who just happens to have autism.

Yet this approach is highly controversial, according to a study published 1 July in Autism. The researchers asked nearly 3,500 people in the autism community in the U.K., including individuals with autism, their family members and friends, and professionals, about which term they use and why. Although professionals in the field preferred ‘person with autism,’ adults who have autism and their family members favored ‘autistic.’ Using ‘person with autism,’ many argued, separates the individual from his or her autism and implies that there is a ‘normal’ person underneath.

As lead researcher Elizabeth Pellicano, a developmental cognitive scientist at University College London,wrote Monday on TheConversation.com: “There is no one way of describing autism on which everyone can agree.” Nor, she added, will there ever be. The best way to move forward, Pellicano wrote, seems to be to agree to disagree.

Chemical restraint

In the U.K., one in six adults with a learning disability or autism receives antipsychotic drugs meant for major mental illnesses. Of those individuals, half do not have a diagnosis that justifies use of the medication,according to a report published Tuesday by Public Health England, a governmental public health agency in the U.K. Likewise, the report found that more than 30 percent of people with autism or a learning disability who are prescribed antidepressants by their doctor had no clinical justification for being on those meds. The practice may affect up to 35,000 adults as well as some children.

As Viv Cooper, chief executive of the Challenging Behavior Foundation, a nonprofit organization based in Chatham, U.K., told The Telegraph, “This confirms what we have heard from families time and time again.” The culture of “chemical restraint,” she continued, must be replaced with “individualized behavior support.” Health officials have promised to respond to the findings with “urgent action,” The Telegraph reported.

Diet debunked

Diets free of the proteins gluten and casein are popular among parents of children with autism, especially those whose children also have gastrointestinal issues, seizures or behavioral problems. Yet there is little scientific evidence that a gluten- and casein-free diet alleviates autism symptoms. A study in the 4 July issue of Acta Paediatrica supports the naysayers, suggesting that gluten and casein do not affect how autism manifests in children.

Researchers from the University of Indonesia and University of Brussels recruited 74 children with autism who had gastrointestinal issues and showed maladaptive behaviors such as aggression or resistance to change. They performed a randomized trial in which they gave half the children gluten-casein supplements in the form of biscuits and half the children placebo biscuits for seven days. Afterward, when they re-evaluated the children, they found no differences in behavior or gastrointestinal symptoms in either group.

Feline friend

“Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood,” a children’s television show on PBS, stars a furry orange hero who, like a modern-day Mister Rogers, teaches life lessons ranging from taking turns to believing in yourself. Daniel Tiger also may be a helpful guide for some children with autism, according to Rasha Madkour, who described her son’s experience with the show on Sunday in The New York Times’ Motherlode blog.

Daniel Tiger is a good role model for children with autism, Madkour wrote, because the character clearly explains each episode’s lesson and then repeatedly acts out examples of the behavior with animated friends. Although Madkour’s account is anecdotal, for her son, at least, Daniel Tiger is making a difference. In one case, Madkour’s son quoted a Daniel Tiger song lyric when trying to persuade his brother to share a toy — “You can take a turn, and then I’ll get it back.” In other instances, Daniel Tiger helps with bathroom issues (“If you have to go potty, stop and go right away!”) or winding down park visits (“It’s almost time to stop, so choose one more thing to do”).

As Madkour wrote: “The show’s social-emotional lessons — the kind of thing school districts are paying millions to promote in specialized curriculums for all children — have been transformative.”

Ladies only

Limpsfield Grange in Surrey is the U.K.’s only state-funded boarding school for girls with special needs. On Tuesday, The Guardian lauded the school for its highly personalized approach toward its pupils, many of whom have autism. Instructors there specialize not only in students with autism, but specifically female ones. As The Guardian points out, girls with autism are more likely than boys to be misdiagnosed and, as a result, misunderstood. Their unique characteristics and needs make havens like Limpsfield Grange all the more vital.


  • Planet Autism

    It’s the girls who don’t get specialist schools like Limpsfield Grange to go to, who have to struggle in mainstream who really need a programme made about them.

  • Cos Michael

    Re Identity Crisis. “The best way to move forward, Pellicano wrote, seems to be to agree to disagree.” That sounds fine, but it is not a good example of courtesy. I state my preference to be called an autistic person and sit in meetings where professionals refer repeatedly to “people with autism”. I read about them too, because I am a professional. Neurotypical people do not expect to be called “People with neurotypicalness” and why would they? They don’t have maleness or femaleness either. And I cannot be “Without autism”. It is what we are, not what we have, unless we can be without it too. I can have flu, but not for my entire life.
    This question relates to how autistic people want to be referred to, so should have been asked of autistic people, not to anyone and everyone who has an opinion. We autistic people require the basic right to choose what we want to be called and the majority of respondents who stated a preference chose “autistic person”. Why should professionals be exempt from respecting us? That creates the antithesis of an “Autistic community” as such disrespect leads to division.

close

Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:

Password:


close

Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.

Name:

Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise:

Comments: