News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.
News / Spotted

Fake facilitation; third strike; Pokémon passion

by  /  22 July 2016

WEEK OF
July 18th

Fake facilitation

A discredited autism ‘therapy’ persists in part because the institute that pioneered the method still promotes it, according to an article in The Atlantic on Wednesday.

In so-called ‘facilitated communication,’ a trained adult, or ‘facilitator,’ applies pressure to a child’s hand or arm to help the child type out her thoughts.

But the messages tend to reflect the imagination or hopes of the facilitator instead, critics contend — and a large body of research supports their skepticism.

In fact, the American Psychological Association and other professional societies stated in the 1990s that there is no scientific evidence that the method reliably relays what a person with autism is thinking.

Yet the Institute on Communication and Inclusion at Syracuse University, where facilitated communication was invented more than two decades ago, continues to spread the word about the method and provide information about how to perform it.

Third strike

An autism researcher has retracted a paper on signaling in a molecular pathway called WNT, published in 2012 in the Journal of Neuroinflammation.
The retraction marks the third for Xiaohong Li at the Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities (IBR) in New York. All of the papers retracted were co-authored by W. Ted Brown, the institute’s director. The first two retractions came in 2013, according to a post published Wednesday on Retraction Watch.

Investigators found problems with figures that “underpin the conclusions of the study,” the retraction note states. Reviewers concluded that the paper was not fabricated, Carl Dobkin, chair of the Research Integrity Committee at IBR, told Retraction Watch. Laboratory mismanagement and “inadequate supervision of junior investigators” might have led to the problems, he said.

Sources

Citation cheaters

More nefarious methods also corrode science these days. Scientists may engage in a number of backhanded tactics that artificially inflate the importance of their work, according to an essay published last week in Nature.

Authors may supply journal editors with a fake email address for a suggested reviewer. If editors take the bait, they solicit a review that the authors themselves write. In other cases, confederates may supply positive reviews solicited via a fake email address. Authors return the favor with citations to the confederate’s work.

This growing category of academic misconduct erodes research credibility. Scientists have been forced to retract at least 300 papers as a result of these underhanded tactics.

The science within these papers is probably valid, but the methods used to elevate their value are not, writes Mario Biagioli, professor of law and science and technology studies at the University of California, Davis.

Sources

Antipsychotics revisited

Doctors may treat irritability associated with autism with any of several antipsychotic drugs. Four of them lead to weight gain.

But the effects of these four on weight are not at all identical, according to results published 7 July in the Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. In fact, the study found no evidence of weight gain with one of the meds: quetiapine (Seroquel).

The researchers analyzed the medical charts of 202 children and young adults who visited either of two psychiatry clinics between 2004 and 2014.

Participants who took olanzapine (Zyprexa) for up to four years put on the most weight, but those who took aripiprazole (Abilify) or risperidone (Risperdal) also put on pounds. Abilify and Risperdal are the only drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of autism-related issues.

Sources
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology / 07 Jul 2016

Weight gain effects of second-generation antipsychotic treatment in autism spectrum disorder

Pokémon passion

The Pokémon Go frenzy has made its way to the autism community. Some say it’s a boon.

The popular mobile-phone game has improved the social skills of a 6-year-old boy with autism, according to a story published Tuesday on TODAY.com.

Ralphie Koppelman usually avoids eye contact with strangers, panics when routines change and struggles to hold a conversation. But playing Pokémon Go, which involves exploring outdoor places in search of virtual Pokémon characters, made him smile, laugh and ask to go to the playground at new times. One time, he even gave a fellow Pokémon player on the street a ‘high-five.’

“Seeing that acceptance was great,” his mother Lenore Koppelman told TODAY.

For similar reasons, a principal at a school for children with autism in Australia encourages his pupils to play the game in the classroom.

“For many of the children I teach it’s hard to engage in social activities — even going down to the shops can be socially overwhelming,” Craig Smith told The Independent. “But what we’re seeing with the Pokémon craze is the same students are making conversation and engaging in social activities through the game.”

Sources

Job moves

Jason Yi, currently a postdoctoral research fellow with Mark Zylka at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, will join the Department of Neuroscience faculty at Washington University in St. Louis.

The Royal Society has named Amina Abubakar, of Kenya Medical Research Institute, the winner of its Pfizer Award 2016, for her research on neurodevelopmental assessments in Africa.

Making a career change? Send your news to jobmoves@spectrumnews.org.


  • Megan M

    The scientific community has a bee in its bonnet about many subjects, and facilitated communication is one of them. Instead of thinking about FC as a static practice, try imagining it as a technique for helping people learn to keyboard independently.
    Yes, at the beginning of the process someone else’s hand is on the computer or the typist’s arm, and it is possible that they are influencing what is written (although as Ido Kedar points out, it is hard to see how this can be reconciled with the widespread assumption that autistics don’t respond to social cues).
    BUT–over time, many autistic individuals move from facilitated to entirely independent communication. They type on their own–with no facilitator present–and express their own ideas. That being the case, why is FC AS A LEARNING PROCESS so consistently rejected by scientists? Is it that they can’t imagine someone with non-verbal autism actually having something to say?

close

Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:

Password:


close

Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.

Name:

Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise:

Comments: