News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.

Banned toxins in mothers’ blood tied to autism risk

by  /  3 October 2016
Latent link: Few large studies have looked at the link between polychlorinated biphenyls and autism.

Bobi / Getty Images

High levels of toxic chemicals called polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in a pregnant woman’s blood raise the risk of autism in her child, suggests a new study1.

Once widely used in electrical appliances, PCBs were banned in the United States in the late 1970s. But PCBs degrade slowly, so they remain in the environment. People can ingest them through certain foods, such as meat and dairy products. The chemicals often show up in blood and breast milk.

Previous studies have tied PCB exposure, especially in utero, to lower scores on cognitive tests and problems with attention and impulse control in children2. A few small studies have also hinted at a role for the chemicals in autism risk3,4. But the idea of a connection between PCBs and autism has been tentative and based on relatively scant evidence.

The new study looked at circulating PCBs in 1,144 pregnant women. “So far, this is the largest study looking at prenatal levels of these chemicals and associations with autism,” says lead researcher Kristen Lyall, assistant professor at the A.J. Drexel Autism Institute in Philadelphia. The work appeared 23 August in Environmental Health Perspectives. The researchers found that high levels of certain PCBs in a pregnant woman’s bloodstream are associated with increased risk of autism or intellectual disability in her child.

The new study provides the best supporting evidence for a PCB-autism link to date, says Amy Kalkbrenner, assistant professor of environmental health sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, who was not involved in the study. The study’s strengths, she says, include not just its size but also its use of blood samples taken from pregnant women. The researchers also looked at children with confirmed autism diagnoses rather than tracking autism-related characteristics.

“For the first time, they were really able to put the whole picture together,” says Kalkbrenner.

Toxin tracking:

The new work is part of the Early Markers for Autism Study — an effort to identify factors during pregnancy and infancy that may indicate or influence autism risk.

Lyall and her colleagues used records from the California Department of Developmental Services to identify 545 children with autism diagnoses and 181 children diagnosed with intellectual disability. They also looked at records for 418 typically developing children.

The researchers analyzed blood samples from the children’s mothers for 11 different PCBs and two organochlorine pesticides. The blood had been collected during the women’s second trimester of pregnancy as part of a birth defects screening program.

The team then divided the women into four groups based on the levels of these chemicals in their blood. They found that women with the highest blood levels of any of four PCBs have a higher risk of having a child with autism than do those with the lowest levels. The increase in risk ranges from 1.5- to 1.8-fold, depending on the specific PCB. They saw a similar risk increase for intellectual disability for a different set of four PCBs, though these numbers are less solid because fewer children with intellectual disability were in the study.

Two of the most commonly found PCBs in the environment, PCB138/158 and PCB153, are associated with both autism and intellectual disability, the researchers found.

“Several of these PCBs could have adverse effects broadly on brain development,” says Heather Volk, assistant professor of mental health at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, who was not involved with the study.

The researchers also linked intellectual disability, but not autism, to maternal blood levels of an organochlorine pesticide called p,p’-DDE.

Chemical groups:

How PCBs might raise the risk of autism or intellectual disability is unclear. The chemicals have effects on various processes, including neuronal and immune system development, thyroid function and chemical tags that influence gene activity. They are also endocrine disrupters, a broad class of chemicals that affect sex hormones.

“The endocrine disrupter link is definitely interesting in the context of autism when we think about the gender difference in autism prevalence across boys and girls,” Volk says. Chemicals that act differently in boys and girls could help explain the preponderance of autism in boys, she says.

Any link between PCBs and autism may have little practical value, however, says Mark Zylka, professor of cell biology and physiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the work. “They’ve been banned for decades now in many cases, and so these are risks that we can’t avoid,” Zylka says. “I’d like to see more studies like this but with other chemicals that are more current potential risks.”

Lyall says the team is investigating how mothers’ genetic features interact with chemical exposures to affect autism risk in their children. They are also planning to examine the blood samples to determine how simultaneous contact with various chemicals influences autism risk. In the current study, “we’re only looking at one class of chemicals at a time, and we know that that’s not the way we live in this world,” she says. “We’re exposed to many different things.”

  1. Lyall K. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. (2016) Epub ahead of print PubMed
  2. Korrick S.A. and S.K. Sagiv Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 20, 198-204 (2008). PubMed
  3. Cheslack-Postava K. et al. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 38, 1-5 (2013) PubMed
  4. Braun J.M. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 513-520 (2014) PubMed
  • Robin P Clarke

    [1] I would put this evidence in the context of the decisive evidence that mercury from non-gamma-2 amalgams has been the main (or only) factor in causing the tenfoldish increase of autism in the past 40 years. Before continuing here it might be useful to quote some comments about scientific publication.
    “Academic journals and societies show an auto-immune response to information that should be the life-blood of medicine.” – Prof. David Healy, author of Pharmageddon
    “We know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong.” – Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet
    “There are many problems with the peer review system. Perhaps the most significant is that the truly imaginative are not being judged by their peers. They have none! …. what has been demonstrated by this study is …. reviewer and editorial incompetence. …. In my Nobel lecture, I published the initial letter of rejection by the Journal of Clinical Investigation of work that was to prove to be of fundamental importance to the development of radioimmunoassay.” – R.S. Yalow, Nobel Laureate in Physiology/Medicine
    “The concept of peer review is based on two myths….. [of which the second is] that in those rare instances in which someone who is exceptional does appear, the ordinary scientist always instantly recognises genius and smooths its path. No one who knows anything at all about the history of science can believe for one second in either myth…..” “Peer review is an open invitation to the crooked….”– David F. Horrobin, Editor, Medical Hypotheses

    “….a gravely pathological situation, calling for further serious inquiry and radical remedy.” – John Ziman, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, Bristol
    “Things are badly wrong with journals and the research they publish.” “The problem doesn’t arise from amateurs dabbling in research but rather from career researchers.”
    – Richard Smith, editor of the British Medical Journal
    [to be continued….]


Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:



Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.


Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise: