News The latest developments in autism research.
Profiles Portraits of scientists who are making a mark on autism research.
Toolbox Emerging tools and techniques that may advance autism research.
Spotted A roundup of autism papers and media mentions you may have missed.
Opinion Conversations on the science of autism research.
Viewpoint Expert opinions on trends and controversies in autism research.
Columnists Dispatches from experts on various facets of autism.
Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Reviews Exploring the intersection of autism and the arts.
Q&A Conversations with experts about noteworthy topics in autism.
Deep Dive In-depth analysis of important topics in autism.
Special Reports Curated collections of articles on special topics in autism.
Webinars Presentations by leading experts on their latest research.
Features / Webinars

Lonnie Zwaigenbaum reviews high-risk infant studies

30 October 2013
The Presenter
Presenter

Lonnie Zwaigenbaum

Professor, University of Alberta

On 30 October, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum discussed research on so-called ‘baby siblings’ of children with autism, as well as the implications of recent advances in early detection of the disorder. Zwaigenbaum is professor of pediatrics at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada.

You can watch a complete replay of the webinar above.

Use the comments section below to submit questions we didn’t have time to discuss during the Q&A session, or to pose follow-up questions for Zwaigenbaum.

Press Policy
The Spectrum Webinar Series aims to facilitate the free exchange of ideas among autism researchers, including discussion of published and unpublished research, hypotheses and results. Members of the press may report information presented during a Spectrum webinar only if that material has already been published elsewhere or they have first obtained express written consent from the presenter.

About Webinars
Presentations by leading experts that showcase new findings, useful techniques and emerging topics in autism research. We invite questions before and during the presentations in the Comments section.
  • Marcia Gragg

    Thanks, Lonnie, for a cogent and exciting update on early identification.

  • Nez Elik, Hamilton Health Sciences

    Do you intend to look at connectivity in brain synapses (more activity in prefrontal; less activity overall)? Also, do you intend to look at strengths in children with autism, such as visual analysis; better self-regulation in areas of interest, etc.?

  • Bridget Gamber, University of Texas, Austin

    Can you speak more to the logistics and ethics involved in beginning intervention for high-risk infants showing symptoms who do not yet have a diagnosis (or meet diagnostic criteria)?

  • Els Blijd-Hoogewys

    Are the first years very important for intervention? What is the disadvantage from being diagnosed later, even when there are less severe symptoms in a child?

  • Amy Esler

    Do you have any thoughts about the relationship between availability of high-quality interventions and diagnosis at 2 versus age 3? In MN, we have excellent ABA covered by insurance, and I’m finding parents are wanting the diagnosis as early as possible, despite their children’s mild symptoms, so they can initiate intervention. (These families have older children already receiving ABA.)

close

Log in to your Spectrum Wiki account

Email Address:

Password:


close

Request your Spectrum Wiki account

Spectrum Wiki is a community of researchers affiliated with an academic or research institutions. To be considered for participation, please fill out this form and a member of our team will respond to your request.

Name:

Email Address:

Title and Lab:

Area of Expertise:

Comments: